Tank waste
vitrification project
Paige
Knight, Hanford Watch -- Feb. 4, 1999
Hanford Watch has supported the concept
of vitrifying (putting nuclear waste into glass logs) from the
beginning as compared to other options: grouting the waste in
cement and burying it in cement trenches in the ground or leaving
it in the 177 deteriorating tanks to leak into the Columbia
River. With its history of poor management, the Department of
Energy has decided to "privatize" this project, which
is the most serious environmental threat in the nation and the
one of the largest magnitude.
We have spoken out repeatedly against the privatization
of the tank waste program from the beginning because it has
looked like a way of deferring gargantuan costs and ultimately
putting off the cleanup. Yet we have also supported the concept
of "getting on with cleanup" and have voiced our skepticism
about there being no backup plan if this contract should fail
or funding from Congress dry up.
The awarding of the vitrification contract to
British Nuclear Fuels, Ltd. (BNFL) was a better choice than
giving the contract to the other bidder, Lockheed Martin. Yet
we are very aware that BNFL does not have a reputation for public
openness, protection of health and safety and environmental
excellence in its programs in Great Britain.
Presently our fears center around the following
points:
-- DOE's plans are out of compliance with the current Tri-Party
Agreement milestones.
-- DOE and Congress have no long-term funding program for a
project that is currently estimated to cost nearly $1 billion
per year for a number of years, and no plan of how to obtain
the necessary funding.
-- Instead of contracting to clean out all of the tank waste
the new contract calls for treating only 10% of the waste in
Hanford's tanks.
-- The funding is set up to pay for a significant amount of
interest for a "privatized" BNFL contract. At a current
$6.9 billion estimated cost, this interest could end up pushing
the cost of the contract to over $10 billion.
Hanford Watch supports the path forward of vitrifying
waste in the tanks. However we want a commitment from Congress
to fund the project, and hold DOE's feet to the fire on making
good on this contract. The Northwest cannot afford to throw
money and time down the drain, at the expense of our economic
livelihood and of our health and safety.