|
By Jim Baldwin We oppose the use of the FFTF for Pu-238 production for space probe batteries because: • The US has enough existing Pu-238 inventory to last at least through 2004, and an existing contract with Russia to buy up to three times that much. • Pu-238 is 275 times as radioactive as weapons-grade plutonium. Any accidents relating to its production or use in spacecraft could be correspondingly worse. • The DOE is under no requirement to create a domestic supply, it simply "proposes" to do so. • NASA has stated that there are plausible alternatives for spacecraft power but has failed to explore these energetically. There is some evidence that the ultimate agenda for Pu-238 is to power the militarization of space in violation of many existing treaties. • If needed, Pu-238 could be made in existing reactors which are already operating anyway. Why produce more nuclear waste for the same end result? • Processing Pu-238 at Hanford would contaminate a clean facility and create more liquid waste to go into the waste tanks.
|