Hanford Watch
Home
Gallery
Hanford map
Introduction
Join e-mail list
K Basins
Tank waste
 
Send e-mail
Hanford Watch
The Oregonian
DOE Sec. Richardson
Sen. Smith
Sen. Wyden
Rep. Blumenauer
Rep. Defazio
Rep. Hooley
Rep. Walden
Rep. Wu
 
Web sites
Nevada Nuclear Waste Project
Tri-City Herald
Washington Dept. of Ecology
Oregon Office of Energy
Don't Waste Oregon
Hanford Advisory Board
Columbia River United
Government. Accountability Project
Oregon Peaceworks
DOE Hanford
Institute for Energy & Environmental Research
Alliance for Nuclear Accountability
Northwest Vets for Peace
KBOO
Dawn Watch
 
Webmaster: Lynn Porter

Big problems with the FY2001 budget

Lynn Porter , Hanford Watch -- March 9, 1999

There are two big problems with the proposed fiscal year 2001 Hanford cleanup budget.

First, it is $232 million short of legal cleanup requirements in the Tri-Party Agreement.

Second, the budget sets aside only $606 million towards the cost of the tank waste vitrification project. According to HEAL, the set-aside fund now has only $383 million in it, and the total by now should be over $1 billion.

What can we do about it?

As for Tri-Party Agreement funding requirements, Washington state could send a wakeup call to President Clinton and Congress by suing the Dept. of Energy. So far Washington has not been willing to do that. The Tri-Party Agreement is only a legally enforceable contract if it is legally enforced.

Activists in Oregon and Washington could try to light a fire under our congressional delegations, to get them to push harder for more Hanford cleanup funding.

On the tank waste set-aside fund, the problem is that Congress does not trust DOE's plan and will not appropriate enough money. DOE needs to come up with a plan that is acceptable to Congress. Otherwise, we are heading for a crash.